robug7 reviewed Sushiko.
The experience in this restaurant was bad. To be fully honest the quality of the food was not that bad compared to other all you can eat restaurant (lot of rice in the plate, but still acceptable) , but the service is incredibly slow. We were here with other collegue and it took like 20 min to have the first plate, which was small because of the quantity limitation per order. Then we were told that it was necessary to finish the plate to make a new order (can be comprehensible when there is no limit on the first order, or the service is quick but here...), and then we waited 20 other minutes for the 2nd services, and it was 13h40 (we arrived at 12h15 and the restaurant was quite empty). So in conclusion, we ate less in a all you can eat restaurant in 1h and half, than in a classic restaurant in 30min... I don't recommand it
Bonnie O'Halloran reviewed 777
I was looking forward to this meal and extremely disappointed. Tortilla chips we ordered were stale, and we got about 2 euros worth for 10. We asked for new ones, they were also stale. Mains were very small for 25/27 a piece (though they tasted very nice) . I booked a table online, and when me and my boyfriend arrived we were told we were going to be sat at the bar. I wouldn't mind if we'd just shown up, but I booked a TABLE and there was no mention that we might be seated at the bar online. Couldn't leave because they had a 40 deposit we'd lose. Was uncomfortable the whole time. Music and bartenders were too loud for us to have a conversation, this meal was supposed to be a special celebration. I ordered a strawberry daiquiri and after a 10 minute wait was told the machine wasn't working, so told them to leave it. Ended up eating and leaving as fast as we could as we weren't enjoying ourselves at all. Staff was wonderful, really nice and helpful, but I don't think I got what I paid for.